Comparison between devices for homogenization and reduction of soybean grain samples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss11.2724Keywords:
Classification, Glycine max, homogenizers, official standard, qualityAbstract
In the grain market the most diverse equipment is used for homogenization and reduction of the working samples. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the performance of devices used for sample homogenization and reduction for soybean classification. A sample composed of 8% of damaged soybeans with yellow and black coat was previously prepared. Samples were homogenized and reduced in bucket, crate, Boerner, 16:1 multichannel splitter and 4:1 multichannel splitter. The design used was completely randomized with five treatments (homogenizers) and one percentage of damaged grains (8%). Evaluations were subjected to analysis of variance and treatment means were compared to one another by Tukey test (p 0.5) and to the mean of the original sample (8%) by Student s t-test. The devices Boerner, 16:1 multichannel splitter and 4:1 multichannel splitter were similar in the homogenization and reduction of the soybean sample. The crate and bucket showed the worst performance in the grain homogenization because they compromise the result of the product’s qualitative analysis.
Downloads
References
Al-Mahasneh, A.M., Rababah, T.M. (2007). Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of green wheat. Journal of Food Engineering 79(4),1467-1473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.04.045
Almeida, M.S., Amaral, M., Morabito, R. (2016). Um estudo sobre a localização de terminais intermodais na rede de escoamento da soja. Production 26(1),562-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.144513
ASAE (American Society of Agricultural Engineers). (2003). ASAE Standards. ASAE S352.2, p.593.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. (2011a). Instrução Normativa nº 29, de 8 de junho de 2011. Aprova os requisitos técnicos obrigatórios e recomendados para certificação de unidades armazenadoras. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, 8 de jun. 2011, nº 15, Seção 1, p.12-32.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, pecuária e abastecimento. (2011b). Instrução Normativa n 54, de 24 de novembro de 2011. Aprova os requisitos e prazos para autorizar credenciamento para serviços de classificação de produtos vegetais. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, 24 de nov. 2011, no 54, Seção 1, p.5-6.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. (2007). Instrução Normativa nº 11, de 15 de maio de 2007. Estabelece o Regulamento Técnico da soja. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, 16 mai. 2007, nº 93, Seção 1, p.13-15.
Canada. (2016). Canadian Grain Commission approved sample dividing equipment. <https://www.grainscanada.gc.ca/en/grain-quality/sampling-grain/sampling-systems-handbook/sampling-systems-handbook-5.html>. Accessed 13 sep 2020.
Carvalho, I.R., Nardino, M., Demari, G.H., Szareski, V.J., Follmann, D.N., Pelegrin, A.J., Ferrari, M., Olizoto, T., Barbosa, M.H., Oliveira, A.C., Maia, L.C., Souza, V.Q. (2017). Relations among phenotypic traits of soybean pods and growth habit. African Journal of Agricultural Research 12(6), 450-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11660
CONAB (Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento). (2020). Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos: Décimo levantamento. Brasília: CONAB. https://www.conab.gov. br/info-agro/safras/graos/boletim-da-safra-de-graos> Accessed 03 ago 2020.
Lorini, I. (2016). Qualidade de sementes e grãos comerciais de soja no Brasil – safra 2014/15. Londrina: Embrapa soja, 190p. (Embrapa soja. Documento, 378).
Fonseca, H. (2002). Sampling plan for the analysis of aflatoxin in peanuts and corn: um update. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 33(2), 97-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822002000200001
Freitas, M.C.M. (2011). A cultura da soja no Brasil: O crescimento da produção brasileira e o surgimento de uma nova fronteira agrícola. Enciclopédia Biosfera 7(12),1-12.
ISO (International Standard Organization). (2009). ISO 24333-2009, Cereals end cereal products – Sampling, CEN.
Mallmann, A.O., Marchioro, A., Oliveira, M.S., Minetto, L., Wovst, L.R.S., Rauber, R.H., Dilkin, P., Mallmann, C.A. (2013). Dois planos de amostragem para análise de fumonisinas em milho. Ciência Rural 43(1),551-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013000300029
Mallmann, A.O., Marchioro, A., Oliveira, M.S., Rauber, R.H., Dilkin, P., Mallmann, C.A. (2014). Comparison of the efficiency between two sampling plans for aflatoxins analysis in maize. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 45(3), 35-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822014000100006
Quirino, J.R., Resende, O., Fonseca, N.N., Oliveira, D.E.C. de, Parizzi, F.C., Souza, T.A.D. (2019). Size of samples and homogenizers during classification of damaged soybeans. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 23(5), 378-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n5p378-382
Sampaio, L.M.B., Sampaio, Y., Bertrand, J. (2012). Fatores determinantes da competitividade dos principais países exportadores do complexo soja no mercado internacional. Organizações Rurais e Agroindústrias 14(2), 227-242.
SENASA (Serviço Nacional de Sanidade y Calidad Agroalimentaria). (1994). RY 1075/94 Norma XXII, Muestreo em granos. http://www.recibidoresdegranos.org/repository/normativas/norma22-en-granos.pdf. Acessed 03 ago 2020.
Trautmann, R.R., Lana, M.C., Guimarães, V.F., Gonçalves, A.C., Steiner, F. (2014). Potencial de água do solo e adubação com boro no crescimento e absorção do nutriente pela cultura da soja. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 38(1), 240-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832014000100024
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (2009). Inspecting Grain - Practical Procedures for Grain Handlers. Washington, DC: USDA, p.90.
Wagner, C., Esbensen, K.H. (2014). A critical assessment of HGCA grain sample guide. TOSforum 2(1), 16-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1255/tosf.18
Whitaker, T.B. (2003). Standardisation of mycotoxin sampling procedures: an urgent necessity. Food Control, 14(4), 233-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00012-4
Whitaker, T.B., Whitaker, T.B., Slate, A.B., Doko, M.B., Maestroni, B.M., Cannavan, A. (2011). Sampling procedures to detect mycotoxins in agricultural commodities. New York: Springer, p.58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9634-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 José Ronaldo Quirino, Osvaldo Resende, Natália Nogueira Fonseca , Daniel Emanuel Cabral de Oliveira, Fátima Chieppe Parizzi, Carlos André Rodrigues Queiroz , Wellytton Darci Quequeto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2020-10-10
Published 2020-11-01
