Ethical Workflow

The journal follows a structured ethical workflow to ensure integrity, transparency, originality, and fairness throughout manuscript handling, peer review, and publication.

Step 1: Initial Ethical Screening

Each submission undergoes preliminary editorial screening for scope, originality, plagiarism, formatting, and ethical compliance.

Step 2: Plagiarism Verification

Manuscripts are checked using plagiarism detection tools. High similarity or unethical overlap may lead to rejection.

Step 3: Double-Blind Review

Reviewer and author identities remain confidential to ensure unbiased academic evaluation.

Step 4: Conflict of Interest Check

Editors and reviewers must disclose conflicts of interest before handling manuscripts.

Step 5: Ethical Decision Making

Editorial decisions are based only on academic merit, originality, methodology, and reviewer reports.

Step 6: Correction or Retraction

If ethical concerns arise after publication, correction, clarification, or retraction procedures are initiated.

Ethical Responsibilities

Authors must submit original unpublished work.
Reviewers must maintain confidentiality.
Editors must ensure fairness and confidentiality.
All parties must avoid unethical publication practices.

The journal follows internationally recognized editorial ethics principles inspired by major scholarly publishing standards.