Effects of computer-assisted oral English instructional programme on high school students in rural areas in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss1.303Keywords:
Computer, ICT, CAOEIP, NigeriaAbstract
One of the key criteria to evaluate the development of any country is by her ability to explore computer knowledge. Based on this assertion, this paper examined the effects of Computer-Assisted Oral English Instructional Programme (CAOEIP) on the performance of high schools students in the rural areas of Nigeria. The study focused on two aspects of information and communication technology (ICT) namely animation and digital Video compared with conventional method of teaching. Two hundred and seventy (270) students were drawn from 6 high schools within the rural areas. The experimental groups were administered a Pretest and Posttest with the use of animation and digital video while control group was taught using conventional method. After six weeks of intensive teaching with animation and digital video instructional media, the students were assessed using Oral English Concept Achievement Test (OECAT), an instrument developed by the researcher. ANOVA and t-test were used for the data analysis. Results show that the experimental group taught with animation and digital video (CAOEIP) performed better than those with conventional method. Recommendations were made based on the findings of the study.
References
AECT. (2008). The Definition of Educational Technology. Association for Educational Communications and
Technology: Definition and Terminology Committee.
Bell, L., & Bull, G. (2010). Digital video and teaching. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher
Education. CITE Journal, 10 (1). Retrieved from
http://www.citejournal.org/vol10/iss1/editorial/article1.cfm
Belcher, D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719050400008X
-186.
Britain, J. & Liber , S. (2004). Evaluation of learning management system software. Chicago: Mayer & Samson.
Brooke, L. (2006). Understanding Instructional Design. In Defining ID About Models Factors Dick and Carey
Kemp, Morrison, & Ross A.D.D.I.E. Rapid Prototyping Future Implications. Retrieved November 1,
, from http://plaza.ufl.edu/brooke83/IDwebsitetemplate/definingIDhtml
Brown, H. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). White
Plains, New York: Longman.
Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Pfeiffer .
Dick, W., & Carey, J. (2005). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Pearson, New-York.
Encarta Encyclopedia. (2009) The History of Computer. Microsoft Encarta Premium Student Program
Manager. U.S.A.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism: Comparing critical
features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6 (4), 50-70.
Federal Republic Nigeria. (2009). National Policy on Education. NERDC, Lagos.
Hahn, L. D., & Hahn, K. (2007). Phrase stress essentials. Paper presented at the International TESOL
conference, Seattle, WA.
Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative
findings. In Language Learning & Technology 8, 34-52. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford:: Oxford University Press.
Ikwuka, I. (2010). Development and validation of audio and video instructional package for teaching Oral–
English in senior schools in Minna, Nigeria.Unpublished Ph.D Thesis.submitted to the department of
Educational Technology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Kang, S. (2002). Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students speaking abilities. In J. C. Richards, & W.
Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language Teaching, 204-211. Cambridge University Press.
Lawal, R. (2001). The rudiments of Oral-English. Faculty of Education University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Published Mimeograph.
Mayer, R. E. (2001).Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge. University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164603
Mayer, R. (2005). Multimedia learning: Guiding visual spatial thinking with instructional animation. In P. Shah, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610448.013
& A. Miyake (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of visual spatial thinking. Cambridge, MA: CUP.
Miller, S. F. (2006). Targeting pronunciation: Communicating clearly in English (2nd Edition). New York:
Houghton Mifflin.
Morrison, Ross, & Kemp. (2000). Designing effective instruction (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley and sons.
Thompson, N. (2001). Why ID? The benefits of Instructional Design Models Teaching with Technology
Today.Retrieved on July 9, 2007, from http://www.uwsa.edu/tt/articles/thompson.htm. 32-35Tony, A. (2004). The effect of video-tape instruction package on the performance of junior secondary school
in Chanchaga Local Government Area, Minna. Submitted to the department of Science Education,
F.U.T. Minna, Nigeria. Unpublished. M.Tech. Dissertation.
Tswanya, S. K. (2006). Rethinking technology in teacher through the impact of technology-enhanced language
teaching and learning. In English Language Teaching Today. 5 (1), 5-15.
Onasanya, S. A. (2002). Effect of instruction in computer animation on students’ performance in 3-dimensional
animation. JEMT (2002) ISS- 0189 - 7012.
Onasanya, S. A., Adegbija, M. V., Olumorin, C. O., & Daramola, F. O. (2008). Education reforms and
assessment of teachers competence in instructional media technology use in junior secondary schools
in Kwara state. In A. R. Lawal, Education reforms in Nigeria- past, present and future (Lawal, A. R.
ed.). Lagos : Stirling- Horden Publishers Ltd.
Otegbayo, C. O. (2014). Development and Assessment of Computer-assisted Oral English Instruction
Programmefor Nigeria Senior Secodary Schools. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis.Submitted to Department
of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin. Nigeria.
Penington, M. C., & Ellis, C. (2000). Cantonese speakers’ memory for English sentences with prosodic clues. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00075
The Modern Language Journal, 84, 327-389.
Plass, J., & Jones, L. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acquisition. In R. Mayer, The cambridge DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.030
handbook of multimedia learning, 467-488 . New -York: CUP.
Rhodes, B. (2004). A guide to researching dialect based largely on Rhodes. Retrieved from
www.universalteacher.org.uk/lang/dialectresearch.htm
Rocap, K. (2003). Defining and designing literacy for the 21st century. In Solomon, Allen, & Resta, Toward
digital equity: Bridging the divide in education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sardegna, V., & Molle, D. (2008). Empowering students with pronunciation learning strategies. Demonstration
given at the international TESOL conference, New York, NY.
Schnotz, W. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer, An integrated model of
text and picture comprehension. New York: CUP.
Warschauer, M. (2002). Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the tracks. In English
Language and Technology 8(4), 28-42.
West Africa Examination Council, (2008-2012). Examiners’ Reports, Lagos: Research Division, West African
Examinations Council
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Christy Olubunmi Otegbayo, Samuel Adenubi Onasanya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
