Determinants of the degree of innovation in the industries listed on the B3
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss4.3718Keywords:
Exploitation, Exploration, SynergyAbstract
The study aims to identify the determinants of the degree of innovation of industries listed on the Brazilian Stock Exchange - B3. To this end, it used as sample 129 industries that trade their shares on the B3. From the principal component analysis, it was found that the innovation indicators are combined into two distinct factors. Therefore, it can be said that the degree of innovation of the firms takes into account the combination of indicators referring to the innovation strategies of exploitation and exploration, and, by encompassing two distinct factors, it is valid to mention that the degree of innovation has a two-dimensional character, suggesting the existence of a synergy between the innovation strategies.
References
Albuquerque Filho, A. R., Freire, M. M. A., Luca, M. M. M., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2020). Influence of Internationalization and Innovation on Business Competitiveness. InternexT - Revista Eletrônica de Negócios Internacionais da ESPM, 15(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v15i1.521
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization science, 20(4), 696-717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Anning-Dorson, T. (2018). Innovation and competitive advantage creation: The role of organizational leadership in service firms from emerging markets. International Marketing Review, 35(4), 580-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2015-0262
Barbosa, S. D., Dantas, D. C., & Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2020). Different strategies for different fields? Exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity, and the performance of self-employed musicians. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12512
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bauer, F., Strobl, A., Dao, M. A., Matzler, K., & Rudolf, N. (2018). Examining links between pre and post M&A value creation mechanisms-Exploitation, exploration and ambidexterity in central European SMEs. Long Range Planning, 51(2), 185-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.07.002
Blazsek, S., & Escribano, A. (2016). Patent propensity, R&D and market competition: Dynamic spillovers of innovation leaders and followers. Journal of Econometrics, 191(1), 145-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.10.005
Chen, Y. (2017). Dynamic ambidexterity: How innovators manage exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons, 60(3), 385-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.01.001
Corrar, L. J., Dias Filho, J. M., & Paulo, E. (2014). Análise multivariada: para os cursos de Administração, Ciências Contábeis e Economia. Atlas Publishing House.
Cui, V., Ding, W. W., & Yanadori, Y. (2019). Exploration versus exploitation in technology firms: The role of compensation structure for R&D workforce. Research Policy, 48(6), 1534-1549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.008
D'Este, P., Marzucchi, A., & Rentocchini, F. (2018). Exploring and yet failing less: learning from past and current exploration in R&D. Industrial and corporate change, 27(3), 525-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtx044
Eustace, C. (2000). The intangible economy: Impact and policy issues. Report of the European high level expert group on the intangible economy.
Fabris, J. P., Camargo, M. E., Russo, S. L., & Zayas-Castro, J. (2015). Technological Innovation, R&D Activities and Innovation System between Organizations. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 13(6), 87-90.
Fávero, L. P., Belfiore, P., Silva, F. L., Chan, B. L. (2009). Data analysis: multivariate modeling for decision making. (4. ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Geiger, S. W., & Makri, M. (2006). Exploration and exploitation innovation processes: The role of organizational slack in R & D intensive firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(1), 97-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2006.05.007
Hsu, C. W., Lien, Y. C., & Chen, H. (2015). R&D internationalization and innovation performance. International business review, 24(2), 187-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.007
Jia, N. (2018). Corporate innovation strategy and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 53, 155-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.10.006
Kayo, E. K., Kimura, H., Martin, D. M. L., & Nakamura, W. T. (2006). Intangible assets, life cycle and value creation. Journal of contemporary management, 10(3), 73-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552006000300005
Kayo, E. K., Teh, C. C., & Basso, L. F. C. (2006). Intangible assets and capital structure: the influence of trademarks and patents on debt. Journal of management, 41(2), 158-168.
Lampert, C. M., & Kim, M. (2019). Going far to go further: Offshoring, exploration, and R&D performance. Journal of Business Research, 103, 376-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.007
Lennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2020). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal, 38(1), 121-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.002
Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: management, measurement, and reporting. Washington: Brookings.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic management journal, 14(S2), 95-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Luger, J., Raisch, S., & Schimmer, M. (2018). Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: The contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organization Science, 29(3), 449-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1189
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Póvoa, L. M. C. (2010). Should the university patent its inventions? Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 9(2), 231-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v9i2.8649001
Ramos, A., & Zilber, S. N. (2015). The impact of investment on firm's innovative capacity. RAI Journal of Management and Innovation, 12(1), 303-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/rai.v12i1.100326
Rezende, J. F., Correia, A. A., & Gomes, B. A. (2017). The intellectual capital and the creation of value in research units linked to the Brazilian Ministry of Science Technology and Innovation. RAI Journal of Management and Innovation, 14(3), 199-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2017.03.010
Sandner, P., & Block, J. (2011). The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. The Valuation of Intangible Assets. Research Policy, 40(7), 969-985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004
Severgnini, E., Galdamez, E. V. C., & Vieira, V. A. (2019). The Effects of Exploration, Exploitation, and Ambidexterity on Software Firm Performance. RAC-Revista de Administracao Contemporanea, 23(1), 111-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019170330
Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.001
Teh, C. C., Kayo, E. K., & Kimura, H. (2008). Trademarks, patents, and value creation. RAM. Journal of Mackenzie Administration, 9(1), 86-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-69712008000100005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Sales Almendra, Gésio de Lima Veras, Ruthelle Maria de Carvalho Sousa, Alisson Araújo Andrade Silva, Mário Jorge Campos dos Santos, Denise Santos Ruzene, Daniel Pereira Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2022-03-24
Published 2022-04-01
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Ramon Santos Carvalho, Valéria Melo Mendonça , Gilton José Ferreira da Silva, Mário Jorge Campos dos Santos, Patentometric Profile of Social Water , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 8 No. 6 (2020): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research
- Gésio de Lima Veras, Mário Jorge Campos dos Santos, Rafael Sales Almendra, Daniel Pereira da Silva, Technological innovation, tax incentives and economic efficiency in the Brazilian scenario , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 10 No. 4 (2022): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research