Effect of priming and different initial soil moisture on desi chickpea ICCV 95107 (Cicer arietinum L.) dry matter production (kg/ha)

Authors

  • Kamithi K.D Department of Agriculture, Kenya
  • Kibe A. M. Egerton University, Kenya
  • Wachira F. Egerton University, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss2.514

Abstract

Technologies such as seed priming have been reported to result in early and uniform crop germination, enhancing optimum crop stand and establishment, eventually leading to optimal crop yields in the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASALs). This study, therefore, was initiated to evaluate the dry matter production of chickpea under different priming methods, varying priming durations and different initial soil moisture levels. Field experiments were carried out at Mwea Irrigation Agricultural Development Centre (MIAD) farm Kirinyaga County, Kenya during 2012/2013 seasons. A split plot experimental design was used to test effects of no priming, hydro priming and halo priming at 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 % NaCl2 concentration) and at 8, 10 and 12 hours priming duration on germination and growth of desi chickpea ICCV 95107. Altogether, the trial comprised 13 treatment combinations replicated three times with pre-sowing irrigation to soils at field capacity (FC) (100%), 75 %, 50 % and 25 %. Data was collected at growth stages of 25,50,75,90 and 105 days after sowing (DAS). The highest dry matter (DM) yields of 5001.1 and 3973.0 kg/ha was realized under 100 % FC at 105 DAS in season I and II, respectively. Dry matter accumulation (kg/ha) increased from 25 DAS to 105 DAS in both season under all pre sowing irrigation conditions, which correlates to growth stages. Dry matter also increased with increased pre sowing irrigation from 25% FC to 100% FC, and at every stage of growth. Halo priming for 8 hours with 0.2% NaCl2 distilled water solution gave the highest DM at all stages of growth (P ≤ 0.05). Significantly higher DM yields (P ≤ 0.05) were produced at 25% FC pre sowing irrigation with no priming (6500.0 kg/ha) and 0.2% NaCl2 for 12 hours (5900.0 kg/ha) by 90 DAS D during the wet season (SI). Dry matter ranged from 6440.0kg/ha at 50% FC- 0.2% NaCl2 for 8 hours to 6713.0kg/ha at 75% FC- 0.1% NaCl2 for 10 hours 6970.0 kg/ha at 0.2% NaCl2 for 8 hours. During the drier season (SII), the highest DM yields of 5017.0 and 4285.0 kg/ha were realized from 100% FC pre-sowing irrigation and priming of 0.2% NaCl2 for 12 hours and 0.2% NaCl2 for 10 hours, respectively. Therefore, adequate soil moisture of over 75% FC is necessary if effectiveness of priming 0.1 to 0.2% NaCl2 for 8 to 12 hours is to be realized under clay ASALs sandy loam soils of Mwea where droughts lead to prolonged seed emergence period, leading to deterioration of the seedbed and increased soil compaction, that eventually result in poor crop emergence, establishment and poor crop yields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Kibe A. M., Egerton University, Kenya

    Department of Crops, Horticulture and Soil Sciences

  • Wachira F., Egerton University, Kenya

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

References

Anwar, M.R., McKenzie, B.A. and Hill, G.D. (2003). Phenology and growth response to irrigation and sowing date of Kabuli chickpea in a cool-temperate sub humid climate. Journal of Agric. Sci. 141(3-4):273-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859603003629

Ashraf, M. and Foolad, M. R. (2005). Pre sowing seed treatment: A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth and crop yield under saline and non saline conditions. Advanced Agronomy Journal 88,223-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88006-X

Bewley, J. D. and Black, M. (1994). The Encyclopedia of Seeds: Science, technology and uses. Journal of Technology and Engineering 2006 Pg 828-829.

Bouyoucous, G.F. (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal 54:464-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x

Bradford, K.J. (1986). Manipulation of seed water relations via osmotic priming to improve germination under stress conditions. Horticultural Science 21:1105-1112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.21.5.1105

Ghassemi-Golezani, K., M., Movahhedi, F., Rahimzadeh-Khoyi and Moghaddam, M. (1998). Effects of water deficiency on growth and yield of two chickpea varieties at different plant densities. Agric. Sci. Tabriz. (Iran). 7(3-4):17-42.

Harris, D., & Hollington, P.A. (2001). ‘On-farm’ seed priming – an update. Tropical Agriculture Association (UK) Newsletter, 21(4):7

Harris, D., Breese, W. A., and Kumar Rao, J. V.D.K. (2005). The improvement of crop yield in marginal environment using “On farm” seed priming: Nodulation, nitrogen fixation and disease resistance. Australian Journal of Agronomy 56(11):1211-1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05079

Harris, D., Joshi, A., Khan, P.A., Gothkar, P., & Sodhi, S. 1999. On farm seed priming in semi-arid agriculture: development and evaluation in maize, rice and chickpea in India using participatory methods, Experimental Agriculture, 35: 15-29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479799001027

Harris, D., Rashid, A., Arif, M. and Yunas, M. (2005). On Farm Seed Priming. Using participatory methods to revive and refine a key technology. Australian Journal of Agronomy.90:129-179.

Henckel,P.A( 1964).Physiology of plants under drought. Annual Plant physiology, 15:363-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.15.060164.002051

Jaetzhold, R. and H. Schmidt (1982). Farm management handbook of Kenya (Rift Valley). Ministry of Agriculture, livestock development and marketing.

Kamithi, D.K., Kibe, A. M. and Akuja, T. (2008). The effect of nitrogen and Plant Population on Growth and Yield of Chickpea Under Dry land Condition of Kenya. Msc Thesis of Egerton University.

Little, M. T. and J. F. Hills (1978). Agricultural Experimentation. Design and Analysis (13: 167 – 225).

Malhotra, R.F., Singh, K.B. and Saxena, M.C. (1997). Effect of irrigation on winter-sown chickpea in a Mediterranean environment. Journal Agron. & Crop Sci.178 (4): 237-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.tb00496.x

Muhammad Aslam, Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Himayatullah, Muhammad Ayaz, Haji Khalil Ahmad, Muhammad Mansoor And Khalid Hussain (2010). Effect Of Soil Moisture Depletions And De-Topping On Yield And Yield Components Of Chickpea. Sarhad Journal Agric. Vol. No 26, No. 2, 2010. Pp 177-187

Parvender, S. (2006). Growth analysis and yield of greengram genotypes as influenced by varying irrigation schedules during summer season. Journal Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 31(1):112-114.

Scotte , R.K., English, S.D, Wood, S.D and Nsworth,M.H.U (1973).The yield of sugar beet in relation to weather and length of the growing season. Journal Agric.Sci. 81:339-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600059001

Singh, S., Malik, R.K. Dhukia, R.S., Punia S.S. and Ashok, Y. (2006). Correlation and interaction studies in late sown chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under various irrigation, sulphur and seed inoculation levels. Envir. Ecol. 24S: 876-879

Downloads

Published

2016-02-01

How to Cite

K.D, K., A. M., K., & F., W. (2016). Effect of priming and different initial soil moisture on desi chickpea ICCV 95107 (Cicer arietinum L.) dry matter production (kg/ha). International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 4(2), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss2.514