Metadata analysis of systematic literature reviews on academic spin-offs

an overview of reviews

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss7.3815

Keywords:

academic spin-off, systematic review, metadata analysis, PRISMA method, bibliometric

Abstract

Besides assuming the role of teaching, research, and extension, the university, has expanded the boundaries of scientific knowledge to promote a business ecosystem. The business-related activities can be driven by the leadership of students with an entrepreneurial capacity, based on the technology transfer produced by the academic research and generated by companies that somehow have been idealized or had the active participation of the faculty members and the technology under their control. This model of companies, named in the literature as academic spin-off, has increased the attention of researchers at two main points: i. understanding the phenomenon itself and ii. contribute to identifying the lack of the process, whether related to the support structure or capacitation of faculty members to develop the entrepreneurial activities, as well as in understanding the commercialization of knowledge as technology transfer. In this context, the present work provided a metadata analysis of systematic literature reviews on the academic spin-off, mapping the knowledge on the subject and searching for reviews that cover the technology transfer models to study the viability of protecting the academic intellectual property as a product. Methodology: the data used in this study were retrieved from the database Web of Science and revised according to the protocol Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The bibliometric analysis of metadata was conducted in RStudio software with the package Bibliometrix and its web interface Biblioshiny. Results: 40 review articles published in peer-reviewed journals from 2006 to 2021 were selected from the initial collection. Then, as result of the bibliometric analysis, it was obtained the data of production indices (main authors, sources, and most cited articles), the evolution of chronological discussion on the subject, and other complementary. Conclusion: it was found indications of studies that discuss technology transfer models and others that examined empiric models in the academic scenario. However, in the selected collection, was not identified any review papers on academic entrepreneurship that were related to the viability of intellectual property as products to be commercialized. Also, it was identified that the word academic entrepreneurship stands out as the main keyword word to represent the research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Marco A. Domingues, Federal University of Sergipe

    Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Science

     Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Sergipe

  • Hortência E. P. Santana, Federal University of Sergipe

    Graduate Program in Biotechnology

  • Denise S. Ruzene, Federal University of Sergipe

    Graduate Program in Biotechnology

    Northeastern Biotechnology Network, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil

  • Daniel P Silva, Federal University of Sergipe

    Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Science, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil

    Graduate Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil

    Northeastern Biotechnology Network, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil

References

Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2014). How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 101(2), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8

Agarwal, S., Ramadani, V., Gerguri-Rashiti, S., Agrawal, V., & Dixit, J. K. (2020). Inclusivity of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitude among young community: evidence from India. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 14(2), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2020-0024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2020-0024

Allen, S. D., Link, A. N., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2007). Entrepreneurship and human capital: Evidence of patenting activity from the academic sector. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(6), 937–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00207.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00207.x

Almeida, F. L. (2018). Insights and Perspectives from a Literature Review on University Spin-Offs. Management Research and Practice, 10(2), 27–40. www.mrp.ase.ro

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017a). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017b). Biblioshiny: Bibliometrix for no coders. Bibliometrix.Org. https://www.bibliometrix.org/biblioshiny/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0

Audretsch, D. B., Aldridge, T. T., & Sanders, M. (2011). Social capital building and new business formation: A case study in Silicon Valley. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391939

Carlsson, B., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: A historical review. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1193–1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp043

Cerver Romero, E., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Fernandes, C. I. (2021). The multiple faces of the entrepreneurial university: a review of the prevailing theoretical approaches. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(4), 1173–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09815-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09815-4

Chapman, D., Smith, H. L., Wood, P., Barnes, T., & Romeo, S. (2011). University Enterprise: The Growth and Impact of University-Related Companies in London. Industry and Higher Education, 25(6), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2011.0066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2011.0066

Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284

Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6

de Cleyn, S. H., Braet, J., & Klofsten, M. (2015). How human capital interacts with the early development of academic spin-offs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0294-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0294-z

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7

Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6

Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R and D Management, 35(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x

Etzkowitz, H., Mack, A., Schaffer, T., Scopa, J., Guo, L., & Pospelova, T. (2020). Innovation by design: SPARK and the Overcoming of Stanford University’s Translational “Valley of Death” in Bio-Medicine. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(6), 1113–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2966

Figueiredo, D. B., Paranhos, R., Silva, J. A. da, Rocha, E. C. da, & Alves, D. P. (2014). O que é, para que serve e como se faz uma meta-análise? Teoria e Pesquisa, 23(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.4322/tp.2014.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/tp.2014.018

Fleischmann-Struzek, C., Goldfarb, D. M., Schlattmann, P., Schlapbach, L. J., Reinhart, K., & Kissoon, N. (2018). The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 6(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30063-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30063-8

Fellnhofer, K. (2019). Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: A bibliometric mapping and visualization. Educational Research Review, 27, 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.10.002

Fleischmann-Struzek, C., Goldfarb, D. M., Schlattmann, P., Schlapbach, L. J., Reinhart, K., & Kissoon, N. (2018). The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 6(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30063-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30063-8

Guckenbiehl, P., Corral de Zubielqui, G., & Lindsay, N. (2021). Knowledge and innovation in start-up ventures: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121026

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M., & Mian, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4

Hayter, C. S., Nelson, A. J., Zayed, S., & O’Connor, A. C. (2018). Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(4), 1039–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9657-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9657-5

Hemmert, M., Cross, A. R., Cheng, Y., Kim, J. J., Kotosaka, M., Waldenberger, F., & Zheng, L. J. (2021). New venture entrepreneurship and context in East Asia: a systematic literature review. Asian Business and Management, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-021-00163-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-021-00163-1

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Hmieleski, K. M., & Powell, E. E. (2018). The psychological foundations of university science commercialization: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 43–77. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0139

IBGE. (2014a). Pesquisa de Inovação (PINTEC). In Pesquisa de Inovação 2014. http://www.pintec.ibge.gov.br/downloads/PUBLICACAO/PUBLICAÇÃO PINTEC 2014.pdf

IBGE, I. B. de G. e E.-. (2014b). Demografia das Empresas. Estudos & Pesquisa - Informação Econômica. https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-sala-de-imprensa/2013-agencia-de-noticias/releases/25738-demografia-das-empresas-e-empreendedorismo-2017-taxa-de-sobrevivencia-foi-de-84-8

Ismail, A. Q. T., Fritze, A., Rüdiger, M., & Ismail, K. M. (2021). Obstetric forceps dimensions and the newborn head biometry: Time for an update. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 256, 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.046

Karpińska, A. (2020). Innovation and science dilemmas. Unintended consequences of innovation policy for science. Polish experience. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), 1718055. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1718055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1718055

Kinch, M. S., Horn, C., Kraft, Z., & Schwartz, T. (2020). Expanding roles for academic entrepreneurship in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 25(11), 1905–1909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.004

Kobylińska, U., & Lavios, J. J. (2020). Development of research on the university entrepreneurship ecosystem: Trends and areas of interest of researchers based on a systematic review of literature. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.005

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Maresova, P., Stemberkova, R., & Fadeyi, O. (2019). Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review. Administrative Sciences, 9(3), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030067

Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C. S., Galvão, A. R., & Santos, G. (2017). Entrepreneurial university: towards a better understanding of past trends and future directions. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 11(3), 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-02-2017-0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-02-2017-0019

Mathisen, M. T., & Rasmussen, E. (2019). The development, growth, and performance of university spin-offs: a critical review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(6), 1891–1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-018-09714-9/TABLES/9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-09714-9

McNeill, M. (2020). About RStudio. Rstudio (R). https://rstudio.com/about/

Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R and D Management, 48(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12228

Miranda, F. J., Chamorro, A., & Rubio, S. (2018). Re-thinking university spin-off: a critical literature review and a research agenda. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(4), 1007–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9647-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9647-z

Mmbaga, N. A., Mathias, B. D., Williams, D. W., & Cardon, M. S. (2020). A review of and future agenda for research on identity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106049

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., … Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. In PLoS Medicine (Vol. 6, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Neves, S., Brito, C. (2020). Academic entrepreneurship intentions: a systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development 645. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2019-0451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2019-0451

Nikitovic, D., Berdiaki, A., Spyridaki, I., Krasanakis, T., Tsatsakis, A., & Tzanakakis, G. N. (2018). Proteoglycans-Biomarkers and targets in cancer therapy. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 9(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00069

Nsanzumuhire, S. U., & Groot, W. (2020). Context perspective on University-Industry Collaboration processes: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861

OECD Environmental Indicators. (2001). OECD Environmental Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264193499-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264193499-en

OECD, O. for E. C. and D. (2007). Survival and Growth 6 45 Eurostat − OECD Manual on Business Demography Statistics 6.1 Survival of newly born enterprises Typology of survival.

O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011

O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R and D Management, 37(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00454.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00454.x

O’Shea, R. P., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: A conceptual framework. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9060-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9060-0

O’Shea, Rory ; Allen, Thomas ; O’Gorman, Colm ; Roche, F. (2004). Universities and Technology Transfer : A Review of Academic Entrepreneurship Literature. Irish Journal of Management, 25(2), 11–29. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=886737421&Fmt=7&clientId=11502&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Pedersen, D. B., Grønvad, J. F., & Hvidtfeldt, R. (2020). Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities—A literature review. Research Evaluation, 29(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/RESEVAL/RVZ033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz033

Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research Policy, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114

Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007

R Foundation. (2021). What is R? Web Page R Fundation. https://www.r-project.org/about.html

Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. In Journal of Enterprising Communities (Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 354–372). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2017-0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2017-0006

Schettini, F., Giuliano, M., Giudici, F., Conte, B., de Placido, P., Venturini, S., Rognoni, C., Leo, A. di, Locci, M., Jerusalem, G., Mastro, L. del, Puglisi, F., Conte, P., de Laurentiis, M., Pusztai, L., Rimawi, M. F., Schiff, R., Arpino, G., de Placido, S., … Generali, D. (2021a). Endocrine‐based treatments in clinically‐relevant subgroups of hormone receptor‐positive/her2‐negative metastatic breast cancer: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Cancers, 13(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061458

Schettini, F., Giuliano, M., Lambertini, M., Bartsch, R., Pinato, D. J., Onesti, C. E., Harbeck, N., Lüftner, D., Rottey, S., van Dam, P. A., Zaman, K., Mustacchi, G., Gligorov, J., Awada, A., Campone, M., Wildiers, H., Gennari, A., Tjan‐heijnen, V. C. G., Cortes, J., … Generali, D. (2021b). Anthracyclines strike back: Rediscovering non‐pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in current therapeutic scenarios of breast cancer. Cancers, 13(17), 4421. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174421

Schmitz, A., Urbano, D., Dandolini, G. A., de Souza, J. A., & Guerrero, M. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: a systematic literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 369–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0401-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0401-z

Schnurbus, V., & Edvardsson, I. R. (2020). The Third Mission Among Nordic Universities: A Systematic Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1816577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1816577

SEBRAE. (2010). Doze Anos de Monitoramento da Sobrevivência e Mortalidade de Empresas. In Sistema Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. http://www.sebraesp.com.br/arquivos_site/biblioteca/EstudosPesquisas/mortalidade/mortalidade_12_anos.pdf

Sebrae, S. B. de A. às M. e P. E. (2017). Panorama dos Pequenos Negócios: 2017: SEBRAE-SP. https://www.sebrae.com.br/Sebrae/Portal Sebrae/UFs/SP/Pesquisas/Panorama_dos_Pequenos_Negocios_2018_AF.pdf

Sebrae, S. B. de A. às M. e P. E. (2019). Panorama SEBRAE: Janeiro/2019. datasebrae.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Panorama-Sebrae_012019.pdf

Secundo, G., Ndou, V., del Vecchio, P., & de Pascale, G. (2019). Knowledge management in entrepreneurial universities: A structured literature review and avenue for future research agenda. Management Decision, 57(12), 3226–3257. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1266

Secundo, G., Rippa, P., & Meoli, M. (2020). Digital transformation in entrepreneurship education centres: preliminary evidence from the Italian Contamination Labs network. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26(7), 1589–1605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0618

Sferrazza, G., Brusotti, G., Zonfrillo, M., Temporini, C., Tengattini, S., Bononi, M., Tateo, F., Calleri, E., & Pierimarchi, P. (2021). Hovenia dulcis thumberg: Phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology and regulatory framework for its use in the european union. Molecules, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26040903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26040903

Silva, C. F. da, Ramos Filho, A. D. C., Renault, T. B., Fonseca, M. V. D. A., & Yates, S. (2021). Tipologias de Empreendedores Acadêmicos e Limites e Possibilidades da Integração com Empresas e o Estado. Revista Administração Em Diálogo - RAD, 23(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2021v23i2.50713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2021v23i2.50713

Stal, E., & Fujino, A. (2006). Industry-University Relationship in Brazil Under the Innovation Act. Review of Administration and Innovation - RAI, 2(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.5585/rai.v2i1.30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/rai.v2i1.30

Terán - Pérez, B. M., Valdez Lafarga, C., & Miranda Félix, A. (2020). Emprendimiento académico y spin-off universitario: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, 7(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.16967/23898186.630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16967/23898186.630

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

van Rooij, A. (2014). University Knowledge Production and Innovation: Getting a Grip. In Minerva (Vol. 52, Issue 2, pp. 263–272). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9254-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9254-1

van Wenum, M., Chamuleau, R. A., van Gulik, T. M., Siliakus, A., Seppen, J., & Hoekstra, R. (2014). Bioartificial livers in vitro and in vivo: Tailoring biocomponents to the expanding variety of applications. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 14(12), 1745–1760. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2014.950651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2014.950651

Walsh, G. S., Cunningham, J. A., Mordue, T., McLeay, F., O’Kane, C., & Connolly, N. (2021). What business schools do to support academic entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 988–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896805

Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.005

Wright, M., Hmieleski, K. M., Siegel, D. S., & Ensley, M. D. (2007). The role of human capital in technological entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(6), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00202.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00202.x

Zahra, S. A., van de Velde, E., & Larrañeta, B. (2007). Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 569–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm018

Downloads

Published

2022-07-01

How to Cite

Domingues, M. A. ., Santana, H. E. P. ., Ruzene, D. S., & Silva, D. P. (2022). Metadata analysis of systematic literature reviews on academic spin-offs: an overview of reviews. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 10(7), 259-282. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss7.3815
Received 2022-05-19
Accepted 2022-06-24
Published 2022-07-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)