It’s Critical

Student Attitudes toward Critical Thinking and an Assessment of a Lecture to an Introductory Engineering Class

Authors

  • Esther K Cho University of San Diego, USA Author
    • Karly V. Jerman University of San Diego, USA Author
      • Kameron J. LaCalli University of San Diego, USA Author
        • Sabrina E. Lucero University of San Diego, USA Author
          • Victoria S. Maraga University of San Diego, USA Author
            • David P. Pennington University of San Diego, USA Author
              • Aimee E. Slavensky University of San Diego, USA Author
                • Rachel E. Stein University of San Diego, USA Author
                  • Neil V. Vranicar University of San Diego, USA Author
                    • Frank Jacobitz University of San Diego, USA Author

                      DOI:

                      https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss12.72

                      Keywords:

                      Critical Thinking, Skillful Analysis, Bias, Engineering Education

                      Abstract

                      Critical thinking is an essential skill for achievement as an engineering student and for success in the engineering profession. Critical thinking can be defined as a mental process to responsibly form an unbiased conclusion that includes identification, skillful analysis, and evaluation of evidence to guide decision-making. This article evaluates a research project undertaken by students at the University of San Diego. In the investigators’ work, they analyzed the definitions of critical thinking and bias, what tools could be used to help in the critical thinking process, and how concepts such as bias and critical thinking affect engineers in their occupations. The team then presented this information to several introductory engineering classes in the form of a lecture and asked the students to assess their knowledge and understanding of critical thinking concepts before and after the presentation. The investigators evaluated the surveys and discovered that most students improved their definitions of bias and critical thinking after the lecture. The students also generally improved their self-rating of understanding critical thinking concepts.

                      Author Biographies

                      • Esther K Cho, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • Karly V. Jerman, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • Kameron J. LaCalli, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • Sabrina E. Lucero, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • Victoria S. Maraga, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • David P. Pennington, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • Aimee E. Slavensky, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • Rachel E. Stein, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • Neil V. Vranicar, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      • Frank Jacobitz, University of San Diego, USA

                        Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering

                      Downloads

                      Published

                      2016-12-01

                      How to Cite

                      Cho, E. K., Jerman, K. V., LaCalli, K. J., Lucero, S. E., Maraga, V. S., Pennington, D. P., Slavensky, A. E., Stein, R. E., Vranicar, N. V., & Jacobitz, F. (2016). It’s Critical: Student Attitudes toward Critical Thinking and an Assessment of a Lecture to an Introductory Engineering Class. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 4(12), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss12.72