A Computer Science Course eTextbook Initiative at a Historically Black Colleges and Universities 98 67
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss10.605Keywords:
STEM, eTextbooks, printed textbooks, HBCU, cost, first time generation, non-traditionalAbstract
Much of the literature has been focused on printed textbooks versus eTextbooks. Other studies have examined the concerns with the high cost of textbooks. Only a minimum amount of literature has discussed how eTextbooks can play an important role for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, (STEM) student who attend Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) in ensuring both cost reduction and to improve student success. This paper details the authors’ experience with the development and delivery of an eTextbook. The cost reduction and suggestions are made for how instructors can use these benefits to assist first time generation students and non-traditional students who have challenges with purchasing their textbooks due to the increase of cost of printed textbooks. Readers will become familiar with the eBook project and why it was designed with students being the number one priority.
References
Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2007). Turn the page: Making college textbooks more affordable. Retrieved from the U.S. Department of Education website: http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/acsfa/turnthepage.pdf
Aharony, N. (2014a). The effect of personal and situational factors on LIS students’ and professionals’ intentions to use E-books. Library & Information Science Research, 36, 106-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.01.001
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers and Education, 78, 227-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
Baker-Eveleth, L. J., Miller, J. R., & Tucker, L. (2011). Lowering business education cost with a custom professor-written online text. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 248-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.502911
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipping learning: Gateway to student engagement. Learning and Leading with Technology, 41(7), 18-23.
Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 185-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x
Cady, M., & Griffin, M. (2010). Is it time to switch to digital textbooks? Learning & Leading
with Technology, 38(3), 6.
Cengage Learning and Eduventures. (2010). Instructors and students: Technology use, engagement and learning outcomes [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://www.cengage.com/trends/pdf/CL - EduventuresSurvey2010.pdf
Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2011). A comparative study of using blogs and wikis for collaborative knowledge construction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 38, 71-78.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987, March). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3-7.
Christopher, L. C. (2009). Academic publishing: Digital alternatives to expensive textbooks. Retrieved from http://www.seyboldreport.com/bookpublishing/academic-publishing-digital-alternatives-expensive-text books
College Board. (2015-2016). Trends in college pricing 2015. Retrieved from http://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/2015-trends-college-pricing-final-508.pdf
Dean, Matthew. (2016). A call to embrace social reading in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(3), 296-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.991934
DeNoyelles, A., & Chen, B. (2014). Exploring students' e-textbook practices in higher education. Journal of Information Influency, 3(1), 37-50.
DeNoyelles, A., Raible, J., & Seilhamer, R. (2015, July 6). Exploring students' e-textbook practices in higher education. EDUCAUSE Review.
Hsu, H., & Wang, S. (2011). The impact of using blogs on college students’ reading comprehension and learning motivation. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 68-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070903509177
Kim, J., & Jung, H. (2010). South korean digital textbook project. Computers in the Schools,27(1), 247–265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2010.523887
Koch, James. 2006. An Economic Analysis of Textbook Pricing and Textbook Markets. ACSFA College Textbook Cost Study Plan Proposal, report prepared for the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In Alvermann, D.E., Unrau, N.J., & Ruddell, R.B. (Eds.). (2013). Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed.). (pp. 1150-1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/0710.42
Leung, L., & Wei, R.A.N. (1999). Who are the mobile phone have-nots? Influences and consequences. New Media and Society, 1(2), 209-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614449922225564
Malm, E., & Defranco, J. F. (2012). Toward a student-centered measure of learning management system utilization. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40, 401-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.4.f
McFadden, C. (2012). Are textbooks dead? Making sense of the digital transition. Publishing Research Quarterly, 28(2), 93-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-012-9266-3
Medlin, B. D. (2001). The factors that may influence a faculty member’s decision to adopt electronic technologies in instruction (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University). ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (UMI No. AAT 3095210)
Miller, J. R., & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2010). Methods of use of an online economics textbook. American Journal of Business Education, 3(11), 39-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v3i11.61
Millis, B. J. (Ed.). (2010). Cooperative learning in higher education: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
National Association of College Stores. (2012). Where the new textbook dollar goes. Retrieved from http://www.nacs.org.
Parisot, A. H. (1997). Distance education as a catalyst for changing teaching in the community college: Implications for institutional policy. New Directions for Community Colleges, 99, 5-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.9901
Prasad, D., & Usagawa, T. (2016). Progressing toward open textbooks learning analytics system. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 4(3), 56-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v4i3.190
Redden, M. (2011, August 23).7 in 10 Students have skipped buying a textbook because of its cost. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Retrieved from http://chronicle.com
Reynolds, R. (2011), Trends influencing the growth of digital textbooks in US higher education. Publishing Research Quarterly, 27(2), 178-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-011-9216-5
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Shepperd, J. A., Grace, J. L., & Koch, E. J. (2008). Evaluating the electronic textbook: is it time to dispense with the paper text? Teaching Of Psychology, 35(1), 2–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701818532
Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize undergraduate STEM classroom practices. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12, 618-627.State Public Interest Research Groups. (2005). Rip-Off 101: How the publishing industry’s practices needlessly drive up textbook costs. Retrieved from http://www.studentpirgs.org/news/new-report-shows-college-textbooks-are-ripoff-101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
United States Government Accountability Office. (2005). College textbooks: Enhanced offerings appear to drive recent price increases: GAO-05-806. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GaAO-05-806.
United States Government Accountability Office. (2013). College textbooks: Students have greater access to textbook information: GA0-13-368. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-368.
Weisbaum, H. (2016, February). Students are still saddled with soaring textbook costs, NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/students-are-still-saddled-soaring-textbook-costs-report-says-n516011
Woody, W., Daniel, D., & Baker, C. (2010). E-books or textbooks: students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005
Wright, D. G., & Abell, C. H. (2011). Using YouTube to bridge the gap between baby boomers and millennials. Journal of Nursing Education, 50, 299-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110419-03
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 D'Nita Andrews Graham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
