Quality of laying eggs using prebiotic additives created in cage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss8.3284Keywords:
Antibiotics, aviculture, physical-chemical characteristicsAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the quality of eggs in laying hens reared at different densities in cage-free system, receiving diets with the addition of prebiotic additives. An observational study was carried out with 45 laying hens of the Novogen Brown scaling, which was in the phase of peak production (28 – 37 weeks), in prototypes of reduced scale without air conditioning and divided into group 1 (G1): density of two poultry /m² (11 poultry ) and diet with addition of a prebiotic pool; group 2 (G2): density of three poultry /m² (17 poultry ) and commercial diet without the addition of prebiotics and antibiotics; group 3 (G3): density of three poultry /m² (17 poultry ) and also diet with the addition of a prebiotic pool. In this study, the statistical evaluation was performed, the effects of densities 2 poultry /m² (G1) or 3 poultry /m² (G3) and the effects of diet with prebiotics (G3) and without prebiotics (G2) in laying poultry were performed. The data were submitted to variance analysis by the GLM procedure of the SAS Program V9 (2002), using the Student's T Test at a level of 5% significance. The results referring to eggeso (g), albumen height (mm), yolk color, haugh unit (UH), peel resistance (Kgf) between G1 and G3 showed no statistically difference, since in relation to the thickness of the shell (mm) differed (P>0.05). In the analysis between G2 and G3, the statistical difference (P>0.05) obtained among all the panels analyzed. In the face of the above, it can be reported that the results of quality variables undergo the action of prebiotics in laying hens created in the Cage-free system.
References
Blokhuis, H.J., Ekkel, E.D., Korte, S.M., Hopster, H., Van Reenen, C.G. 2000. Farm animal welfare research in interaction with society. Veterinary Quarterly, Bilthoven, p. 217-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2000.9695062
Pineda-Quiroga, C.; Atxaerandio, R.; Zubiria, I.; Gonzalez-Pozuelo, I.; Hurtado, A.; Ruiz, R.; Garcia-Rodriguez, A. Productive performance and cecal microbial counts of floor housed laying hens supplemented with dry whey poder alone or combined with Pediococcus acidilactici in the late phase of production. Livestock Science, v.195, p.9-12, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.11.007
Rostagno, H. S.; Albino, L.F.T.; Donzele, M. I. H. J.L.; Sakomura, N.K.; Perazzo, G.G.; Hail, A.; Teixeira, M. L.; Rodrigues, P.B.; Oliveira, R. F.; Barreto, S.L. T.; Brito, C.O. Brazilian tables for poultry and pigs: food composition and nutritionalrequirements. Ed. UFV, 2017. 488 p.
Silva, L. P., Norberg, J. L. 2003. Prebiotics in the nutrition of non-ruminants. Rural Science,v. 33, n. 5, p. 983-990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782003000500029
Silva, G. F.; Pereira, D. F.; Bueno, L. G. F. ; Santos, T. S.; Tavares, B. O. Performance of laying hens and economic viability of different climatization systems. Italian Journal of Animal Science (Online), v. 12, p. 286-294, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e47
Świątkiewicz, S.; Koreleski, J.; Arczewska, A. (2010a) Laying performance and eggshell quality in laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotics and organic acids. Czech Journal of Animal Science, v.55, n.7, p.294-304, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/207/2009-CJAS
Świątkiewicz, S.; Koreleski, J.; Arczewska, A. Effect of organic acids and prebiotics on bone quality in laying hens fed diets with two levels of calcium and phosphorus. Acta Veterinaria Brno, v.79, n.2, p.185-193, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201079020185
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Daiane Dantas Fagundes, Leda Gobbo de Freitas Bueno, Gislaine Trecenti Teixeira, Marcos Martinez do Valley, Mario Mollo Neto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2021-07-13
Published 2021-08-01
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Marcel Alessandro de Almeida, Manoel Garcia Neto, Leda Gobbo de Freitas Bueno, Max José de Araujo Faria Junior, Marcos Franke Pinto, Nonlinear Feed Formulation For Broiler , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 8 No. 12 (2020): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research
- Jose Roberto Rasi, Mario Mollo Neto, Roberto Bernardo, Bibliographic prospecting for dryeration process system evaluation in the face of the conventional grain drying , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research